It's time to take an updated look at the gaming performance of the Core i9-14900K and Ryzen 7 7800X3D, comparing head-to-head AMD and Intel's best gaming processors to see which one you should buy.
https://www.techspot.com/review/2783-ryzen-7800x3d-vs-core-i9-14900k/
The 7800x 3d isn't the better CPU though. If money is no object and Intel did not exist I would still buy a 7950x 3d over the 7800x 3d. Cause what can you do, it's not a particularly good cpu. It's pathetically slow on everything but games.
Intel and their paid actors need to go away.
Do you have any articles and or videos showing scaling shader compilation in RPCS 3? I am very interested in this. I've played more than a handful of games with shader compilation that takes a few seconds to 1 minute maximum on my 7800X3D.
How many shaders are they compiling? For example in GT6 I've only reached 63k, and I've heard that other games like metal gear solid hit over 400k. Havent tested metal gear, but I assume thats going to take a LOT
The only sensible choice for playing games is a cpu that costs 400€. Right, yeah.
Actually, the resolution depends on the GPU one is using. You need to remember that with up scaling technology like DLSS and FSR, running anything below quality mode in 4K means it’s rendering at 1080p. If you are gaming at 1440p, quality mode on either up scaling tech means 1080p native. So we are running games at 1080p more often than we know with very GPU taxing games introduced in 2023.
Imagine the year 2023 where you just paid $2k for 4090 to run games in 1080p because Nvidia wants you to use RT and DLSS
But the 14900K is slower in gaming and uses more power. Why should I pay more for something that is slower, even when money is of no object?
Lmao, what a bunch of BS. Sure, if you run Cinebench with 32 threads at max overclocks, the power consumption is ridiculous. However, when playing normal games that utilize a few cores, my 6.2Ghz P / 4.8Ghz E 14900K consumes about 65W. On idle it's about 12W, in single core games around 35W. In very heavy games the power consumption does jump a bit, but it's pretty unrealistic to be honest. SOTTR can load 16 cores to the max, and in that scenario it was 165W. Still a third of a stock 4090, so I don't really know if you can say it "heats up the room to a ridiculous degree".
Cool story bro. Wish it was true though.
I shall once again point you both to this:
Why, would anyone, spend all that money on the 14900K to then limit it even further? Why would you just not buy the 7800X3D instead?
Guy is apparently not talking about games. You think his coworker is thermal throttling with an AIO playing games? Apparently he is talking about MT workloads. In which case even at 200w the 14900k is literally twice as fast as the 7800x 3d.
Man this is utterly painful, I'll screenshot it then:
You're not missing much. Strawman is a well known intel fanboi. So is Antsu, apparently. I'll never understand it, but some will always meat-shield for corporations for 0 compensation. I do love their solution to the overheating that totally doesnt happen when gaming is to cut the TDP down to 200w, kneecapping the performance of the K chip.
Im not talking about the graph but about the post I replied to.
